<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The present and near future of the press release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techprgems.com/2006/11/the-present-and-near-future-of-the-press-release/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techprgems.com/2006/11/the-present-and-near-future-of-the-press-release/</link>
	<description>Conversations about PR, social media, technology and marketing -- with a special focus on the social media community in Greater Boston</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 03:42:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Whitley</title>
		<link>http://techprgems.com/2006/11/the-present-and-near-future-of-the-press-release/comment-page-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Whitley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 07:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techprgems.com/2006/11/the-present-and-near-future-of-the-press-release/#comment-519</guid>
		<description>Thanks for mentioning &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.prxbuilder.com&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PRX Builder&lt;/a&gt;.  Our initial beta release allowed us to gather feedback that has resulted in hundreds of improvements.  We&#039;ve smoothed a lot of edges that may have been frustrating and we&#039;ll continue to improve the application.  I encourage you to take another look.  We welcome comments and suggestions at &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.prxbuilder.com/support&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PRX Builder Support&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As a way to increase participation from smaller firms and individuals, PRX Builder is now completely free to use during this phase of our rollout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for mentioning <a HREF="http://www.prxbuilder.com" REL="nofollow">PRX Builder</a>.  Our initial beta release allowed us to gather feedback that has resulted in hundreds of improvements.  We&#8217;ve smoothed a lot of edges that may have been frustrating and we&#8217;ll continue to improve the application.  I encourage you to take another look.  We welcome comments and suggestions at <a HREF="http://www.prxbuilder.com/support" REL="nofollow">PRX Builder Support</a></p>
<p>As a way to increase participation from smaller firms and individuals, PRX Builder is now completely free to use during this phase of our rollout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://techprgems.com/2006/11/the-present-and-near-future-of-the-press-release/comment-page-1/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techprgems.com/2006/11/the-present-and-near-future-of-the-press-release/#comment-510</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a bit ironic, isn&#039;t it? Kind of like &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://topazpartners.blogspot.com/2006/11/i-finally-got-to-meet-you.html&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;social media people meeting in person&lt;/a&gt;... :-) But maybe they&#039;re both necessary, at least for the time being. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But as you look to where this is heading from a press release perspective, I think you&#039;ll see two things happen. First, look to the &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.socialmediarelease.org/&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;next phase of the &quot;social media release&quot;&lt;/a&gt;. Okay, it still calls itself a release (I voted for emphasizing &quot;news&quot; over &quot;release&quot;), but it&#039;s basically 100% RSS, and a microformat to boot. This is pretty far from the traditional release. Add to this the change in formatting (if not content) for these &quot;social media releases&quot; (e.g., bullets, not &#039;graphs), and you start to get something thats diverging from what people traditionally called a press release (it looks more like an &quot;advisory&quot;).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Second, to combat this shift away from traditional release formats and methods (but not, alas, content), you&#039;ll see the wire services quickly adapt. We&#039;ve already seen PR Newswire&#039;s MultiVu offering take off, and seen BusinessWire jump on a collaboration with Vocus around PRWeb. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And you&#039;ll see more happening. The wire services are not, if they&#039;re smart, at risk of becoming outdated. They are, after all, the best equipped to offer new services and applications that support the emerging standards like hRelease, XBRL, etc. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If the wire services are scared of anyone right now, it&#039;s Edelman, who&#039;s been promising his own take at a &quot;deconstructed press release.&quot; But will an agency-specific offering ever reach critical mass with other agencies? I have my doubts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a bit ironic, isn&#8217;t it? Kind of like <a HREF="http://topazpartners.blogspot.com/2006/11/i-finally-got-to-meet-you.html" REL="nofollow">social media people meeting in person</a>&#8230; <img src='http://techprgems.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  But maybe they&#8217;re both necessary, at least for the time being. </p>
<p>But as you look to where this is heading from a press release perspective, I think you&#8217;ll see two things happen. First, look to the <a HREF="http://www.socialmediarelease.org/" REL="nofollow">next phase of the &#8220;social media release&#8221;</a>. Okay, it still calls itself a release (I voted for emphasizing &#8220;news&#8221; over &#8220;release&#8221;), but it&#8217;s basically 100% RSS, and a microformat to boot. This is pretty far from the traditional release. Add to this the change in formatting (if not content) for these &#8220;social media releases&#8221; (e.g., bullets, not &#8216;graphs), and you start to get something thats diverging from what people traditionally called a press release (it looks more like an &#8220;advisory&#8221;).</p>
<p>Second, to combat this shift away from traditional release formats and methods (but not, alas, content), you&#8217;ll see the wire services quickly adapt. We&#8217;ve already seen PR Newswire&#8217;s MultiVu offering take off, and seen BusinessWire jump on a collaboration with Vocus around PRWeb. </p>
<p>And you&#8217;ll see more happening. The wire services are not, if they&#8217;re smart, at risk of becoming outdated. They are, after all, the best equipped to offer new services and applications that support the emerging standards like hRelease, XBRL, etc. </p>
<p>If the wire services are scared of anyone right now, it&#8217;s Edelman, who&#8217;s been promising his own take at a &#8220;deconstructed press release.&#8221; But will an agency-specific offering ever reach critical mass with other agencies? I have my doubts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Jones</title>
		<link>http://techprgems.com/2006/11/the-present-and-near-future-of-the-press-release/comment-page-1/#comment-509</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techprgems.com/2006/11/the-present-and-near-future-of-the-press-release/#comment-509</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed reading this timeline. I&#039;ve been interested from a distance in this topic, but haven&#039;t really seen the value in a new media release going out on an old media proprietary distribution network (newswire). What&#039;s the current thinking about this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed reading this timeline. I&#8217;ve been interested from a distance in this topic, but haven&#8217;t really seen the value in a new media release going out on an old media proprietary distribution network (newswire). What&#8217;s the current thinking about this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

