<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PRobecast #18: NikonD80/blogola?, presidential candidates do social media,</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techprgems.com/2007/06/probecast-18-nikond80blogola-presidential-candidates-do-social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techprgems.com/2007/06/probecast-18-nikond80blogola-presidential-candidates-do-social-media/</link>
	<description>Conversations about PR, social media, technology and marketing -- with a special focus on the social media community in Greater Boston</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:52:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://techprgems.com/2007/06/probecast-18-nikond80blogola-presidential-candidates-do-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 03:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techprgems.com/2007/06/probecast-18-nikond80blogola-presidential-candidates-do-social-media/#comment-773</guid>
		<description>No, Doug. Why we are discussing them is that the issues are black and white but still for some they need to be discussed. THAT&#039;S the problem.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Respectfully,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;- Amanda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Doug. Why we are discussing them is that the issues are black and white but still for some they need to be discussed. THAT&#8217;S the problem.</p>
<p>Respectfully,</p>
<p>- Amanda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Haslam</title>
		<link>http://techprgems.com/2007/06/probecast-18-nikond80blogola-presidential-candidates-do-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Haslam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techprgems.com/2007/06/probecast-18-nikond80blogola-presidential-candidates-do-social-media/#comment-772</guid>
		<description>Would you prefer i used &quot;pro&quot; and &quot;con&quot; for the hyperlinks? Perhaps that would have been. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;We didn&#039;t actually refer to the individuals in the podcast, as I&#039;m sure you heard. I wish the issues were easy-- we wouldn&#039;t have to discuss them then. Not black and white I&#039;m afraid-- ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you prefer i used &#8220;pro&#8221; and &#8220;con&#8221; for the hyperlinks? Perhaps that would have been. </p>
<p>We didn&#8217;t actually refer to the individuals in the podcast, as I&#8217;m sure you heard. I wish the issues were easy&#8211; we wouldn&#8217;t have to discuss them then. Not black and white I&#8217;m afraid&#8211; ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Chapel</title>
		<link>http://techprgems.com/2007/06/probecast-18-nikond80blogola-presidential-candidates-do-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Chapel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techprgems.com/2007/06/probecast-18-nikond80blogola-presidential-candidates-do-social-media/#comment-771</guid>
		<description>Gentlemen,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Your examples of “good” and “ethical” are ludicrous.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For “good” you link to a post where Jaffe, a recipient of the blogola and a person whose livelihood is based on selling similar blogola programs, uses his kid to shield criticism.  Hello!  Are you really not getting where that not only crosses ethical boundaries but ensures one a direct ticket to Hell?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As far as “ethical,” Ochman’s stupid test aside (see http://tinyurl.com/32s8px ), it would only be ethical now that she’s apparently completed her test if she gave the camera back.  Hundred bucks says she doesn’t.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;C’mon. These issues are not that hard.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Regards,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;- Amanda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gentlemen,</p>
<p>Your examples of “good” and “ethical” are ludicrous.</p>
<p>For “good” you link to a post where Jaffe, a recipient of the blogola and a person whose livelihood is based on selling similar blogola programs, uses his kid to shield criticism.  Hello!  Are you really not getting where that not only crosses ethical boundaries but ensures one a direct ticket to Hell?</p>
<p>As far as “ethical,” Ochman’s stupid test aside (see <a href="http://tinyurl.com/32s8px" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/32s8px</a> ), it would only be ethical now that she’s apparently completed her test if she gave the camera back.  Hundred bucks says she doesn’t.</p>
<p>C’mon. These issues are not that hard.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>- Amanda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

